I don't knwo about that dag. There are a lot of studies pooping up over the last few years showing that the "shit stirrers" could be developing some nasty side effects from all the burning shit.
Well, kyle, you may not get a day off, but at least your duty hours are sham. Tell you what. I'll take a few days off for you. Even drink a beer or two for ya as well. I know, I'm a nice guy. your welcome.
First off, I hate Michael Moore with a passion. I have no idea whatsoever how it is that he is at all famous.
My first question is, what doctor takes 3 weeks to get in to see? I call, schedule something for TOMORROW and go see my GP. If you have a serious problem go to a Walk-In Clinic or the ER. I know quite a few people in Canada that have had serious health issues. One friend of mine had cancer, and was scheduled 6 MONTHS LATER to get a CT scan. He would have died before they even tried to locate the tumor. He came across the border to the US and had it done here the same day. I would love to not have to pay for my health care, but I wouldn't sacrifice the OUTSTANDING care our current medical system has created. We have the best doctors in the world here in the US. (Something we wouldn't have if they didn't make excellent money)
People can say what they want about what HE has to say, but that isn't the point. Anyone that can hear her speak and not want to kill themselves if she's elected to any national office probably needs to have their head checked.
Not saying she's the person to vote for, but to say that "there's nothing there" is both inaccurate and disingenous.
No it's not. "Nothing there" doesnt mean she's not doing what the talking points says, or even that she doesnt agree with them, it just means that she doesn't THINK when she gets a question. Its so bleeding obvious you'd have to be blind to miss it. She simply repeats some conservative mantras that frequently has nothing to do with the question she was asked.. If you look at any other politicians, even George W. Bush, you can atleast trust that he answers the questions he gets asked, even if those answers are lies or just plain fucking stupid) ie: "Bring 'em on" ) atleast he could usually cough up an actual answer. Palin does none of that, she replies with talking points that often shows she doesnt even understand the question. look at this answer:
COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it’s got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.
Now what the fuck does this even mean? Random rambling about tax-cuts and "job creation". Obviously, her answer should have been something like "Because if these big institutions fail, it will be worse for everyone, and heres why:---" But because she doesnt really even consider the question, she just makes up an answer with some conservative ear-candy in there and , as was said, there really is nothing there.
Welcome. Some see a "permit" to demonstrate- granted or not by the whim of a government looking to prevent criticism - as unlawful.
Also, the hippie label is wearing a bit thin. Most of these people weren't even born in the 60s.
In reply to this comment by Moonkai: I registered just to comment on this video... First off, if this guy says "peaceful" one more time I'll kill a kitten. Second, have these guys never heard of an Unlawful Gathering? It had nothing to do with the fact that they were protesting anything. It had to do with the fact that they did not get a permit to gather. (that and the fact that contrary to what he says, using a bullhorn in a cop's face isn't what I would call "peaceful")
Every single time some hippy group gets together they say they're being "peaceful". They don't care about what laws they break as long as they can claim to be "peaceful" and get some more fuel to bash the "establishment".
I would also like to note that not a single Military uniform can be seen. It wouldn't matter if there was really, deadly force was not used. The National Guard has been used for many years for basic crowd control. (legally) Basically what we have is a moron that's trying to make a point.
Thanks, Arvana. I just fixed the embed code. Happy Thanksgiving!
In reply to this comment by arvana: OK, how do we do this? Yours is dead, so you'll need mine's embed; should I dupeof it first, then you copy the embed code?
I registered just to comment on this video... First off, if this guy says "peaceful" one more time I'll kill a kitten. Second, have these guys never heard of an Unlawful Gathering? It had nothing to do with the fact that they were protesting anything. It had to do with the fact that they did not get a permit to gather. (that and the fact that contrary to what he says, using a bullhorn in a cop's face isn't what I would call "peaceful")
Every single time some hippy group gets together they say they're being "peaceful". They don't care about what laws they break as long as they can claim to be "peaceful" and get some more fuel to bash the "establishment".
I would also like to note that not a single Military uniform can be seen. It wouldn't matter if there was really, deadly force was not used. The National Guard has been used for many years for basic crowd control. (legally) Basically what we have is a moron that's trying to make a point.
In reply to this comment by dystopianfuturetoday: >> ^Issykitty: ^Title of the channel is Cats and Dogs + Others, and if you read the channel description you'd know that this fits. I'm in a bad mood, so I apologize for reflexively downvoting your comment, steroidg.
Not even upvoting this. "horrific chemo and radiation" is a huge industry. A cure now would guarantee our financial collapse here in America. And for what? To reverse the second largest population controller we've got? F that.
More photos/explanation of what I do here (Blog Entry by MarineGunrock)
Well, kyle, you may not get a day off, but at least your duty hours are sham. Tell you what. I'll take a few days off for you. Even drink a beer or two for ya as well. I know, I'm a nice guy. your welcome.
Michael Moore Blasts House Health Care Bill
My first question is, what doctor takes 3 weeks to get in to see? I call, schedule something for TOMORROW and go see my GP. If you have a serious problem go to a Walk-In Clinic or the ER.
I know quite a few people in Canada that have had serious health issues. One friend of mine had cancer, and was scheduled 6 MONTHS LATER to get a CT scan. He would have died before they even tried to locate the tumor. He came across the border to the US and had it done here the same day.
I would love to not have to pay for my health care, but I wouldn't sacrifice the OUTSTANDING care our current medical system has created. We have the best doctors in the world here in the US. (Something we wouldn't have if they didn't make excellent money)
TYT: Sarah Palin is still stupid
Anyone that can hear her speak and not want to kill themselves if she's elected to any national office probably needs to have their head checked.
TDS: John Stewart explains why he doesnt like Sarah Palin
Last I checked it was BassAckwards...
TDS: John Stewart explains why he doesnt like Sarah Palin
No it's not.
"Nothing there" doesnt mean she's not doing what the talking points says, or even that she doesnt agree with them, it just means that she doesn't THINK when she gets a question. Its so bleeding obvious you'd have to be blind to miss it. She simply repeats some conservative mantras that frequently has nothing to do with the question she was asked.. If you look at any other politicians, even George W. Bush, you can atleast trust that he answers the questions he gets asked, even if those answers are lies or just plain fucking stupid) ie: "Bring 'em on" ) atleast he could usually cough up an actual answer. Palin does none of that, she replies with talking points that often shows she doesnt even understand the question. look at this answer:
COURIC: Why isn’t it better, Governor Palin, to spend $700 billion helping middle-class families who are struggling with health care, housing, gas and groceries; allow them to spend more and put more money into the economy instead of helping these big financial institutions that played a role in creating this mess?
PALIN: That’s why I say I, like every American I’m speaking with, were ill about this position that we have been put in where it is the taxpayers looking to bail out. But ultimately, what the bailout does is help those who are concerned about the health-care reform that is needed to help shore up our economy, helping the—it’s got to be all about job creation, too, shoring up our economy and putting it back on the right track. So health-care reform and reducing taxes and reining in spending has got to accompany tax reductions and tax relief for Americans. And trade, we’ve got to see trade as opportunity, not as a competitive, scary thing. But one in five jobs being created in the trade sector today, we’ve got to look at that as more opportunity. All those things under the umbrella of job creation. This bailout is a part of that.
Now what the fuck does this even mean? Random rambling about tax-cuts and "job creation". Obviously, her answer should have been something like "Because if these big institutions fail, it will be worse for everyone, and heres why:---" But because she doesnt really even consider the question, she just makes up an answer with some conservative ear-candy in there and , as was said, there really is nothing there.
Sarah Palin Fans: Not That Bright
"I like that she upholds the Constitution".....
Fail....
Junior Senior - Move your feet
Moonkai
Also, the hippie label is wearing a bit thin. Most of these people weren't even born in the 60s.
In reply to this comment by Moonkai:
I registered just to comment on this video...
First off, if this guy says "peaceful" one more time I'll kill a kitten.
Second, have these guys never heard of an Unlawful Gathering? It had nothing to do with the fact that they were protesting anything. It had to do with the fact that they did not get a permit to gather. (that and the fact that contrary to what he says, using a bullhorn in a cop's face isn't what I would call "peaceful")
Every single time some hippy group gets together they say they're being "peaceful". They don't care about what laws they break as long as they can claim to be "peaceful" and get some more fuel to bash the "establishment".
I would also like to note that not a single Military uniform can be seen. It wouldn't matter if there was really, deadly force was not used. The National Guard has been used for many years for basic crowd control. (legally)
Basically what we have is a moron that's trying to make a point.
Steppenwolf - Monster
Graffiti
arvana
In reply to this comment by arvana:
OK, how do we do this? Yours is dead, so you'll need mine's embed; should I dupeof it first, then you copy the embed code?
In reply to this comment by silvercord:
dupe= http://www.videosift.com/video/When-Rednecks-Rap
WeAreChange - New G20 Protest/Police Response Footage
First off, if this guy says "peaceful" one more time I'll kill a kitten.
Second, have these guys never heard of an Unlawful Gathering? It had nothing to do with the fact that they were protesting anything. It had to do with the fact that they did not get a permit to gather. (that and the fact that contrary to what he says, using a bullhorn in a cop's face isn't what I would call "peaceful")
Every single time some hippy group gets together they say they're being "peaceful". They don't care about what laws they break as long as they can claim to be "peaceful" and get some more fuel to bash the "establishment".
I would also like to note that not a single Military uniform can be seen. It wouldn't matter if there was really, deadly force was not used. The National Guard has been used for many years for basic crowd control. (legally)
Basically what we have is a moron that's trying to make a point.
Issykitty
In reply to this comment by Issykitty:
*quality Ludicriss rhymin', KP!
rogernwalsh
The Most Racist Commercial EVER
*dupeof=http://www.videosift.com/video/Gary-s-Mattress-Commercial
TED - Wade Davis on endangered cultures
Bryce, Brycewi19 got his ruby - baby (Happy Talk Post)
will have to suffice,
even though he can't sing 'Three blind mice'.
That's the kinda rhyming you get from someone who just woke up. Congrats!
UCLA students protest an increase in tuition of 32%
dystopianfuturetoday
>> ^Issykitty:
^Title of the channel is Cats and Dogs + Others, and if you read the channel description you'd know that this fits. I'm in a bad mood, so I apologize for reflexively downvoting your comment, steroidg.
Bad kitty.
You love bad kitty (me)!
Cancer Breakthrough. Believe It.